GeForce 820A vs ATI FireGL V8650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1049
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data6.79
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameR600GF117
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 May 2007 (18 years ago)17 March 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,799 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32096
Core clock speed688 MHz775 MHz
Number of transistors720 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate11.0112.40
Floating-point processing power0.4403 TFLOPS0.2976 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs1616
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cache256 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length254 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR4DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed868 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth111.1 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2007 17 March 2014
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm

ATI FireGL V8650 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GeForce 820A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V8650 and GeForce 820A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V8650 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 820A is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL V8650
FireGL V8650
NVIDIA GeForce 820A
GeForce 820A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V8650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 42 votes

Rate GeForce 820A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V8650 or GeForce 820A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.