Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid vs ATI FireGL V8600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameR600Vega 10
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date14 May 2007 (18 years ago)8 August 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,899 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3204096
Core clock speed688 MHz1406 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1677 MHz
Number of transistors720 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)159 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate11.01429.3
Floating-point processing power0.4403 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1664
TMUs16256
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length254 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR4HBM2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed868 MHz1890 MHz
Memory bandwidth111.1 GB/s483.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12.0
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.5
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2007 8 August 2017
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 159 Watt 225 Watt

ATI FireGL V8600 has 41.5% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 64 Liquid, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V8600 and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V8600 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL V8600
FireGL V8600
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V8600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 28 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V8600 or Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.