Radeon Pro 575X vs ATI FireGL V8600

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameR600Polaris 20
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date14 May 2007 (17 years ago)18 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,899 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3202048
Core clock speed688 MHz1096 MHz
Number of transistors720 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)159 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate11.01140.3
Floating-point processing power0.4403 TFLOPS4.489 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs16128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length254 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed868 MHz1700 MHz
Memory bandwidth111.1 GB/s217.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2007 18 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 159 Watt 120 Watt

Pro 575X has an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 32.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V8600 and Radeon Pro 575X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V8600 is a workstation card while Radeon Pro 575X is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL V8600
FireGL V8600
AMD Radeon Pro 575X
Radeon Pro 575X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V8600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 23 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.