Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs ATI FireGL V8600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated584
Place by popularitynot in top-10093
Power efficiencyno data19.69
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameR600Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 May 2007 (18 years ago)15 August 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,899 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32080
Core clock speed688 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors720 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)159 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate11.01no data
Floating-point processing power0.4403 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs16no data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Length254 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR4no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width512 Bitno data
Memory clock speed868 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth111.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Videono data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12_1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2007 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 80 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 159 Watt 28 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 467.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V8600 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V8600 is a workstation graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL V8600
FireGL V8600
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V8600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1096 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V8600 or Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.