GeForce MX570 vs ATI FireGL V8600
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 411 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 42.31 |
| Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | Ampere (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | R600 | GA107 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 14 May 2007 (18 years ago) | May 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,899 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 688 MHz | 832 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1155 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 720 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 159 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 11.01 | 73.92 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.4403 TFLOPS | 4.731 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 40 |
| TMUs | 16 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 64 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 16 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 2 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | 254 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR4 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 868 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 111.1 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.0 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.6 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 80 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 159 Watt | 25 Watt |
GeForce MX570 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 900% more advanced lithography process, and 536% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between FireGL V8600 and GeForce MX570. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that FireGL V8600 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce MX570 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
