Radeon R5 M240 vs ATI FireGL V7600
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1075 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | R600 | Jet |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 6 November 2007 (16 years ago) | 18 September 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 240 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 720 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 127 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 7.200 | 20.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.288 TFLOPS | 0.6592 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 12 | 8 |
| TMUs | 12 | 20 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | no data | Not Listed |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 254 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | Not Listed |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 0 MB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | Not Listed |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| AppAcceleration | - | + |
| HD3D | - | + |
| PowerTune | - | + |
| DualGraphics | - | + |
| ZeroCore | - | + |
| Switchable graphics | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.0 (10_0) | DirectX® 11 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | N/A | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
| Mantle | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 November 2007 | 18 September 2014 |
| Chip lithography | 80 nm | 28 nm |
R5 M240 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between FireGL V7600 and Radeon R5 M240. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that FireGL V7600 is a workstation card while Radeon R5 M240 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
