Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 vs ATI FireGL V7350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameR520Tahiti
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2005 (20 years ago)31 January 2012 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1536
Core clock speed600 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors321 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)111 Watt185 Watt
Texture fill rate9.60088.80
Floating-point processing powerno data2.842 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs1696
L1 Cacheno data384 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB3 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed650 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s240.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_1)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2005 31 January 2012
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 111 Watt 185 Watt

ATI FireGL V7350 has 67% lower power consumption.

HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V7350 and Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V7350 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate FireGL V7350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 16 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V7350 or Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.