GeForce 8600 GT vs ATI FireGL V7200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1364
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
Power efficiencyno data0.56
ArchitectureUltra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameR520G84
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2005 (20 years ago)17 April 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,279 $159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed600 MHz540 MHz
Number of transistors312 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data47 Watt
Texture fill rate9.6008.640
Floating-point processing powerno data0.07616 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs1616
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length229 mm170 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Standard memory config per GPUno data256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed650 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.12.1
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2005 17 April 2007
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 80 nm

8600 GT has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 13% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V7200 and GeForce 8600 GT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V7200 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 8600 GT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate FireGL V7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 1097 votes

Rate GeForce 8600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V7200 or GeForce 8600 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.