GeForce 7900 GT vs ATI FireGL V7200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1262
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.99
ArchitectureUltra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameR520G71
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2005 (20 years ago)9 March 2006 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,279 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed600 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors312 million278 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data48 Watt
Texture fill rate9.60010.80
ROPs1616
TMUs1624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed650 MHz660 MHz
Memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s42.24 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model3.03.0
OpenGL2.12.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2005 9 March 2006

7900 GT has an age advantage of 5 months.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V7200 and GeForce 7900 GT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V7200 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 7900 GT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate FireGL V7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 43 votes

Rate GeForce 7900 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V7200 or GeForce 7900 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.