Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs ATI FireGL V7100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameR480Vega 10
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 December 2004 (21 years ago)7 August 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,099 $699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4096
Core clock speed507 MHz1408 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1668 MHz
Number of transistors160 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)91 Watt345 Watt
Texture fill rate6.084427.0
Floating-point processing powerno data13.66 TFLOPS
ROPs1264
TMUs12256
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length211 mm282 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed520 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth33.28 GB/s483.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2004 7 August 2017
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 91 Watt 345 Watt

ATI FireGL V7100 has 279% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V7100 and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V7100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 30 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V7100 or Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.