Radeon Pro W6900X vs ATI FireGL V7100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated104
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.34
Power efficiencyno data10.69
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameR480Navi 21
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 December 2004 (21 years ago)3 August 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,099 $4,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data5120
Core clock speed507 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2150 MHz
Number of transistors160 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)91 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate6.084688.0
Floating-point processing powerno data22.02 TFLOPS
ROPs12128
TMUs12320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80
L0 Cacheno data1.3 MB
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB
L3 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length211 mm267 mm
Width2-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed520 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth33.28 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2004 3 August 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 32 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 91 Watt 300 Watt

ATI FireGL V7100 has 230% lower power consumption.

Pro W6900X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1757% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V7100 and Radeon Pro W6900X. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 67 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V7100 or Radeon Pro W6900X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.