GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs ATI FireGL V7100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameR480GT218
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 December 2004 (21 years ago)12 October 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,099 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed507 MHz520 MHz
Number of transistors160 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)91 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate6.0844.160
Floating-point processing powerno data0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs124
TMUs128
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length211 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed520 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth33.28 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2004 12 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 91 Watt 31 Watt

210 Rev. 2 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 225% more advanced lithography process, and 194% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V7100 and GeForce 210 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V7100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 210 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 81 votes

Rate GeForce 210 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V7100 or GeForce 210 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.