Radeon RX Vega M vs ATI FireGL V5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated377
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data80.44
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRV530Vega
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2005 (20 years ago)1 February 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed600 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1190 MHz
Number of transistors157 million4,500 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate2.40038.08
ROPs48
TMUs432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVIno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12.0
Shader Model3.05.0
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2005 1 February 2018
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega M has an age advantage of 12 years, a 543% more advanced lithography process, and 133% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V5200 and Radeon RX Vega M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V5200 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 7 votes

Rate FireGL V5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V5200 or Radeon RX Vega M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.