Radeon Pro W5500X vs ATI FireGL V3600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated347
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.06
Power efficiencyno data10.82
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameRV630Navi 14
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date28 June 2007 (18 years ago)11 December 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1201536
Core clock speed600 MHz1187 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1757 MHz
Number of transistors390 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate4.800168.7
Floating-point processing power0.144 TFLOPS5.398 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs896
L2 Cache64 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x HDMI 2.0b
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2007 11 December 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 125 Watt

ATI FireGL V3600 has 71.2% lower power consumption.

Pro W5500X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V3600 and Radeon Pro W5500X. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL V3600
FireGL V3600
AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
Radeon Pro W5500X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate FireGL V3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V3600 or Radeon Pro W5500X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.