HD Graphics 500 vs ATI FireGL V3600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1221
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.22
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameRV630Apollo Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date28 June 2007 (18 years ago)1 September 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12096
Core clock speed600 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data650 MHz
Number of transistors390 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8007.800
Floating-point processing power0.144 TFLOPS0.1248 TFLOPS
ROPs42
TMUs812
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth16 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2007 1 September 2015
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 10 Watt

HD Graphics 500 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 630% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V3600 and HD Graphics 500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V3600 is a workstation graphics card while HD Graphics 500 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL V3600
FireGL V3600
Intel HD Graphics 500
HD Graphics 500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate FireGL V3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 775 votes

Rate HD Graphics 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V3600 or HD Graphics 500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.