Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs ATI FireGL V3400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated452
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.78
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRV530Vega 12
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date1 October 2005 (20 years ago)14 November 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed500 MHz815 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1190 MHz
Number of transistors157 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rate2.00076.16
Floating-point processing powerno data2.437 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs464
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit1024 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s307.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.3
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2005 14 November 2018
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm

Pro Vega 16 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V3400 and Radeon Pro Vega 16. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V3400 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL V3400
FireGL V3400
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Radeon Pro Vega 16

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate FireGL V3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V3400 or Radeon Pro Vega 16, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.