ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs ATI FireGL V3400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1402
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.12
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRV530RV610
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2005 (20 years ago)19 February 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data40
Core clock speed500 MHz398 MHz
Number of transistors157 million180 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data20 Watt
Texture fill rate2.0001.592
Floating-point processing powerno data0.03184 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs44
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz495 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s7.92 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2005 19 February 2008
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm

ATI HD 2400 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V3400 and Radeon HD 2400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V3400 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 2400 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate FireGL V3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 51 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V3400 or Radeon HD 2400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.