Radeon RX Vega XTX vs ATI FireGL V3350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRV515Vega 10
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2005 (20 years ago)8 August 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4096
Core clock speed600 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1630 MHz
Number of transistors107 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400417.3
ROPs464
TMUs4256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1890 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s483.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12.0
Shader Model3.05.0
OpenGL2.04.5
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2005 8 August 2017
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm

RX Vega XTX has an age advantage of 11 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V3350 and Radeon RX Vega XTX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V3350 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega XTX is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL V3350
FireGL V3350
AMD Radeon RX Vega XTX
Radeon RX Vega XTX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate FireGL V3350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 7 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V3350 or Radeon RX Vega XTX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.