Tesla X2090 vs ATI FireGL V3300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameRV515GF110
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 October 2005 (20 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed600 MHz651 MHz
Number of transistors107 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate2.40041.66
Floating-point processing powerno data1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs464
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz924 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s177.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2005 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm

Tesla X2090 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V3300 and Tesla X2090. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate FireGL V3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 14 votes

Rate Tesla X2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V3300 or Tesla X2090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.