Radeon Vega 7 vs ATI FireGL V3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated601
Place by popularitynot in top-10014
Power efficiencyno data11.37
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRV380Cezanne
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 September 2004 (21 years ago)13 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data448
Core clock speed500 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors75 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)46 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate2.00053.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs428

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed350 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2004 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 130 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 46 Watt 45 Watt

Vega 7 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process, and 2.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V3200 and Radeon Vega 7. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V3200 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL V3200
FireGL V3200
AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3126 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V3200 or Radeon Vega 7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.