GRID M6-8Q vs ATI FireGL V3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated535
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data6.55
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameRV380GM204
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 September 2004 (21 years ago)30 August 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1536
Core clock speed500 MHz722 MHz
Number of transistors75 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)46 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate2.00069.31
Floating-point processing powerno data2.218 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs496
L1 Cacheno data576 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed350 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s160.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2004 30 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 46 Watt 100 Watt

ATI FireGL V3200 has 117.4% lower power consumption.

GRID M6-8Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V3200 and GRID M6-8Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL V3200
FireGL V3200
NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
GRID M6-8Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate GRID M6-8Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V3200 or GRID M6-8Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.