Radeon RX 6600 vs ATI FireGL T2-128

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated111
Place by popularitynot in top-10015
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data67.82
Power efficiencyno data20.76
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRV350Navi 23
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2003 (21 year ago)13 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1792
Core clock speed398 MHz1626 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2491 MHz
Number of transistors60 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data132 Watt
Texture fill rate1.592279.0
Floating-point processing powerno data8.928 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed297 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.504 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2003 13 October 2021
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 7 nm

RX 6600 has an age advantage of 18 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL T2-128 and Radeon RX 6600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL T2-128 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL T2-128
FireGL T2-128
AMD Radeon RX 6600
Radeon RX 6600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 14 votes

Rate FireGL T2-128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 9388 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.