Radeon R7 250E vs ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256p
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 742 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 1.10 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 5.59 |
| Architecture | Rage 8 (2002−2007) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | R300 | Cape Verde |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 July 2002 (23 years ago) | 20 December 2013 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $109 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 324 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 110 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 37 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 2.592 | 25.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.8192 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16 |
| TMUs | 8 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 256 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | AGP Pro 8x | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 168 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 276 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 17.66 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0 (9_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 July 2002 | 20 December 2013 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 1 GB |
| Chip lithography | 150 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 37 Watt | 55 Watt |
ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256p has 48.6% lower power consumption.
R7 250E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between FireGL 9700 X1-256p and Radeon R7 250E. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that FireGL 9700 X1-256p is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 250E is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
