ATI Radeon 9200 vs ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256p

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1588
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.03
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameR300RV280
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 July 2002 (23 years ago)1 May 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed324 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors110 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate2.5921.000
ROPs84
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP Pro 8xAGP 8x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed276 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth17.66 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)8.1
OpenGL2.01.4
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 28 Watt

ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256p has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

ATI 9200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and 32.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireGL 9700 X1-256p and Radeon 9200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL 9700 X1-256p is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9200 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256p
FireGL 9700 X1-256p
ATI Radeon 9200
Radeon 9200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL 9700 X1-256p on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 55 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL 9700 X1-256p or Radeon 9200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.