Radeon 740M vs ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256p

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated590
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.29
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameR300Phoenix2
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 July 2002 (23 years ago)31 January 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data256
Core clock speed324 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2800 MHz
Number of transistors110 million20,900 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate2.59244.80
Floating-point processing powerno data2.867 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs816
Ray Tracing Coresno data4
L0 Cacheno data64 KB
L1 Cacheno data64 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP Pro 8xPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed276 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth17.66 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 31 January 2024
Chip lithography 150 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 45 Watt

ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256p has 22% lower power consumption.

Radeon 740M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 21 years, and a 3650% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL 9700 X1-256p and Radeon 740M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL 9700 X1-256p is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 740M is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL 9700 X1-256p on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 193 votes

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL 9700 X1-256p or Radeon 740M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.