GeForce RTX 5050 vs ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256p

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameR300GB207
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 July 2002 (22 years ago)2025

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed324 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Number of transistors110 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm0 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate2.592201.6
Floating-point processing powerno data12.9 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs880
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP Pro 8xPCIe 5.0 x16
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed276 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth17.66 GB/s224.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-9.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 100 Watt

ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256p has 170.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 5050, on the other hand, has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between FireGL 9700 X1-256p and GeForce RTX 5050. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL 9700 X1-256p is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5050 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256p
FireGL 9700 X1-256p
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050
GeForce RTX 5050

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL 9700 X1-256p on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 27 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.