Radeon RX 560 XT vs ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameR300Ellesmere
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 July 2002 (23 years ago)13 March 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1792
Core clock speed325 MHz973 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1073 MHz
Number of transistors110 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate2.600120.2
Floating-point processing powerno data3.846 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs8112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed310 MHz1650 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.84 GB/s211.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 13 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 150 Watt

ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256 has 305.4% lower power consumption.

RX 560 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL 9700 X1-256 and Radeon RX 560 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL 9700 X1-256 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 560 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256
FireGL 9700 X1-256
AMD Radeon RX 560 XT
Radeon RX 560 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate FireGL 9700 X1-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 262 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL 9700 X1-256 or Radeon RX 560 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.