ATI Radeon X1650 vs ATI FireGL 9700 X1-128

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1475
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameR300RV516
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 July 2002 (23 years ago)20 November 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed325 MHz635 MHz
Number of transistors110 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm80 nm
Texture fill rate2.6002.540
ROPs84
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed310 MHz392 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.84 GB/s6.272 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL2.02.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 20 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 80 nm

ATI X1650 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 87.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL 9700 X1-128 and Radeon X1650. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL 9700 X1-128 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X1650 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL 9700 X1-128
FireGL 9700 X1-128
ATI Radeon X1650
Radeon X1650

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 604 votes

Rate FireGL 9700 X1-128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 74 votes

Rate Radeon X1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL 9700 X1-128 or Radeon X1650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.