GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs ATI FireGL 9700 X1-128

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1528
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.13
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameR300NV36
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 July 2002 (23 years ago)23 October 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed325 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors110 million82 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data46 Watt
Texture fill rate2.6001.900
ROPs84
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xAGP 8x
Lengthno data229 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed310 MHz453 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.84 GB/s14.5 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)9.0a
OpenGL2.01.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 23 October 2003
Chip lithography 150 nm 130 nm

FX 5700 Ultra has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 15.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL 9700 X1-128 and GeForce FX 5700 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL 9700 X1-128 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL 9700 X1-128
FireGL 9700 X1-128
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 604 votes

Rate FireGL 9700 X1-128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5700 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL 9700 X1-128 or GeForce FX 5700 Ultra, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.