Radeon 660M vs ATI FireGL 9500 Z1-128

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated554
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data15.38
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameR300Rembrandt+
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2002 (23 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed325 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors110 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data40 Watt
Texture fill rate1.30045.60
Floating-point processing powerno data1.459 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs424
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L0 Cacheno data96 KB
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed310 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth19.84 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVIPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2002 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 150 nm 6 nm

Radeon 660M has an age advantage of 20 years, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL 9500 Z1-128 and Radeon 660M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL 9500 Z1-128 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 660M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL 9500 Z1-128
FireGL 9500 Z1-128
AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate FireGL 9500 Z1-128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 441 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL 9500 Z1-128 or Radeon 660M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.