Iris Plus Graphics G4 vs ATI FireGL 8800

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameR200Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 August 2001 (24 years ago)29 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed300 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1050 MHz
Number of transistors60 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate2.40025.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8064 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x1
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed290 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth9.28 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.1.97

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2001 29 May 2019
Chip lithography 150 nm 10 nm

Iris Plus Graphics G4 has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL 8800 and Iris Plus Graphics G4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL 8800 is a workstation graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics G4 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2 votes

Rate FireGL 8800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 9 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL 8800 or Iris Plus Graphics G4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.