RTX A1000 vs Extreme Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated251
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data39.70
ArchitectureGeneration 2.0 (2002−2003)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameBrookdaleGA107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2002 (24 years ago)16 April 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed200 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1462 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate0.2105.3
Floating-point processing powerno data6.737 TFLOPS
ROPs132
TMUs172
Tensor Coresno data72
Ray Tracing Coresno data18
L1 Cacheno data2.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceFSBPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Extreme Graphics 1
Samples: 1
RTX A1000 10789
+1078800%
Samples: 546

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 150 nm 8 nm

RTX A1000 has a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Extreme Graphics and RTX A1000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Extreme Graphics is a desktop graphics card while RTX A1000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 64 votes

Rate Extreme Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 70 votes

Rate RTX A1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Extreme Graphics or RTX A1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.