RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs Extreme Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 2.0 (2002−2003)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameBrookdaleAD103
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date2002 (23 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data9728 ×2
Core clock speed200 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1680 MHz
Number of transistorsno data45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rate0.2510.7 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data32.69 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1112 ×2
TMUs1304 ×2
Tensor Coresno data304 ×2
Ray Tracing Coresno data76 ×2
L1 Cacheno data9.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceFSBPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data576.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 150 nm 5 nm

RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Extreme Graphics and RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Extreme Graphics is a desktop graphics card while RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Extreme Graphics
Extreme Graphics
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 63 votes

Rate Extreme Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Extreme Graphics or RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.