Radeon 760M vs Extreme Graphics 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated420
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data66.58
ArchitectureGeneration 2.0 (2002−2003)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameMontaraPhoenix
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 December 2003 (21 years ago)31 January 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed200 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed266 MHz2599 MHz
Number of transistorsno data25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.2783.17
Floating-point processing powerno data5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs116
TMUs132
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L0 Cacheno data128 KB
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 December 2003 31 January 2024
Chip lithography 130 nm 4 nm

Radeon 760M has an age advantage of 20 years, and a 3150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Extreme Graphics 2 and Radeon 760M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Extreme Graphics 2 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 760M is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Extreme Graphics 2
Extreme Graphics 2
AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 15 votes

Rate Extreme Graphics 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 415 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Extreme Graphics 2 or Radeon 760M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.