Quadro 4100 vs Extreme Graphics 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 2.0 (2002−2003)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameMontaraGK104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 December 2003 (22 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1344
Core clock speed200 MHz797 MHz
Boost clock speed266 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rate0.2789.26
ROPs132
TMUs1112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data160 mm
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1782 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data57.02 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data6.5 (5.1)
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2.175
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm

Quadro 4100 has a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Extreme Graphics 2 and Quadro 4100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Extreme Graphics 2 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro 4100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Extreme Graphics 2
Extreme Graphics 2
NVIDIA Quadro 4100
Quadro 4100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 15 votes

Rate Extreme Graphics 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5 votes

Rate Quadro 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Extreme Graphics 2 or Quadro 4100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.