A16 PCIe vs Extreme Graphics 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 2.0 (2002−2003)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameMontaraGA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 December 2003 (22 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560 ×4
Core clock speed200 MHz885 MHz
Boost clock speed266 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate0.27135.6 ×4
Floating-point processing powerno data8.678 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs148 ×4
TMUs180 ×4
Tensor Coresno data80 ×4
Ray Tracing Coresno data20 ×4
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB ×4
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit ×4
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1812 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data231.9 GB/s ×4
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 December 2003 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 130 nm 8 nm

A16 PCIe has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Extreme Graphics 2 and A16 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Extreme Graphics 2 is a notebook graphics card while A16 PCIe is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Extreme Graphics 2
Extreme Graphics 2
NVIDIA A16 PCIe
A16 PCIe

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 15 votes

Rate Extreme Graphics 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 444 votes

Rate A16 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Extreme Graphics 2 or A16 PCIe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.