To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.
ATI EGA Wonder 800+ vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Price now
no data
Games supported
38%
- Interface PCI
- Core clock speed 10 MHz
- Max video memory 0 MB
- Memory type DRAM
- Memory clock speed 10 MHz
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
Price now
6698$
Games supported
100%
General info
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 22 |
| Value for money | no data | 3.38 |
| Architecture | Wonder (1986−1992) | Turing (2018−2021) |
| GPU code name | 18800-1 | TU102 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 January 1988 (34 years ago) | 13 August 2018 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $6,299 |
| Price now | no data | $6698 (1.1x MSRP) |
Value for money
no data
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Core clock speed | 10 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 18,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 900 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 509.8 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCI | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DRAM | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 0 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 32 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 10 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 40 MB/s | no data |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | None | no data |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | None | no data |
| OpenCL | None | no data |
| Vulkan | no data | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | no data | 7.5 |
Advantages and disadvantages
| Novelty | 1 January 1988 | 13 August 2018 |
| Chip lithography | 900 nm | 12 nm |
Technical City couldn't decide between
and
We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EGA Wonder 800+ is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of Quadro RTX 6000 by AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro RTX 6000 from AMD is Radeon Pro W6800, which is slower by 4% and lower by 10 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro RTX 6000:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.
