TITAN Ada vs Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code namePonte VecchioAD102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 January 2023 (1 year ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1638418432
Core clock speed900 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed1600 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors100,000 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2400 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rate1,6381,452
Floating-point processing power52.43 TFLOPS92.9 TFLOPS
ROPsno data192
TMUs1024576
Tensor Cores1024576
Ray Tracing Cores128144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm336 mm
Width2-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pin2x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount128 GB48 GB
Memory bus width8192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1565 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth3,205 GB/s1.15 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 128 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2400 Watt 800 Watt

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

TITAN Ada, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and TITAN Ada. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Data Center GPU Max Subsystem is a workstation graphics card while TITAN Ada is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
NVIDIA TITAN Ada
TITAN Ada

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 81 vote

Rate Data Center GPU Max Subsystem on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate TITAN Ada on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.