Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code namePonte VecchioNavi 48
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 January 2023 (2 years ago)July 2025

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16384 ×44096
Core clock speed900 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1600 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors100,000 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2400 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate1,638 ×4747.5
Floating-point processing power52.43 TFLOPS ×447.84 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUs1024 ×4256
Tensor Cores1024 ×4128
Ray Tracing Cores128 ×464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 GB ×432 GB
Memory bus width8192 Bit ×4256 Bit
Memory clock speed1565 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth3,205 GB/s ×4644.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
VulkanN/A1.3
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 128 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2400 Watt 300 Watt

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 700% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and Radeon AI PRO R9700. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 129 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max Subsystem on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Data Center GPU Max Subsystem or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.