RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Data Center GPU Max 1100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated72
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data81.29
Power efficiencyno data45.42
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code namePonte VecchioAD107
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 January 2023 (1 year ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores71682816
Core clock speed1000 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed1550 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors100,000 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate694.4187.4
Floating-point processing power22.22 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUs44888
Tensor Cores44888
Ray Tracing Cores5622

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mm168 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount48 GB16 GB
Memory bus width8192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,229 GB/s256.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2023 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 70 Watt

Data Center GPU Max 1100 has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 328.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Data Center GPU Max 1100 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
Data Center GPU Max 1100
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 6 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max 1100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.