Radeon Pro W6400 vs CMP 50HX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated307
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data30.92
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameTU102Navi 24
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date24 June 2021 (4 years ago)19 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584768
Core clock speed1350 MHz2331 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz2331 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate296.6111.9
Floating-point processing power11.07 TFLOPS3.58 TFLOPS
ROPs8032
TMUs19248
Tensor Cores448no data
Ray Tracing Cores5612
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cache3.5 MB256 KB
L2 Cache5 MB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount10 GB4 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth560.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 June 2021 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 10 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 50 Watt

CMP 50HX has a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro W6400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between CMP 50HX and Radeon Pro W6400. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA CMP 50HX
CMP 50HX
AMD Radeon Pro W6400
Radeon Pro W6400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 66 votes

Rate CMP 50HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 29 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about CMP 50HX or Radeon Pro W6400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.