Radeon Pro W6400 vs CMP 170HX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated308
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data30.95
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGA100Navi 24
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 September 2021 (4 years ago)19 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,299 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4480768
Core clock speed1140 MHz2331 MHz
Boost clock speed1410 MHz2331 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate394.8111.9
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPS3.58 TFLOPS
ROPs12832
TMUs28048
Tensor Cores280no data
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cache13.1 MB256 KB
L2 Cache8 MB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1458 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,493 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.6
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL3.02.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA8.0-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2021 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 50 Watt

CMP 170HX has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro W6400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between CMP 170HX and Radeon Pro W6400. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA CMP 170HX
CMP 170HX
AMD Radeon Pro W6400
Radeon Pro W6400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 20 votes

Rate CMP 170HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 30 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about CMP 170HX or Radeon Pro W6400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.