Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand vs Atari VCS 800 GPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameBanded KestrelWhistler
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 December 2020 (5 years ago)28 March 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192480
Core clock speed300 MHz485 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate14.4111.64
Floating-point processing power0.4612 TFLOPS0.4656 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs1224
L1 Cacheno data48 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Length295 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.2N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2020 28 March 2012
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 20 Watt

Atari VCS 800 GPU has an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atari VCS 800 GPU and Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atari VCS 800 GPU is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Atari VCS 800 GPU
Atari VCS 800 GPU
AMD Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand
Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 5 votes

Rate Atari VCS 800 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Atari VCS 800 GPU or Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.