Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs Atari VCS 800 GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBanded KestrelTU102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date14 December 2020 (4 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $6,299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1924608
Core clock speed300 MHz1305 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate14.41449.3
Floating-point processing power0.4612 TFLOPS14.38 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs12288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Length295 mm267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.21.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2020 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 260 Watt

Atari VCS 800 GPU has an age advantage of 2 years, and 1633.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Passive, on the other hand, has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atari VCS 800 GPU and Quadro RTX 6000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atari VCS 800 GPU is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 6000 Passive is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Atari VCS 800 GPU
Atari VCS 800 GPU
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 5 votes

Rate Atari VCS 800 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 9 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.