Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics vs Atari VCS 800 GPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Gen. 5 Arrandale (2010)
GPU code nameBanded KestrelGMA HD
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 December 2020 (5 years ago)10 January 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19212
Core clock speed300 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate14.41no data
Floating-point processing power0.4612 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data
Length295 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1200 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2020 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Atari VCS 800 GPU has an age advantage of 10 years, a 221% more advanced lithography process, and 133% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atari VCS 800 GPU and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atari VCS 800 GPU is a desktop graphics card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 9 votes

Rate Atari VCS 800 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 146 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Atari VCS 800 GPU or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.