GeForce G205M vs Atari VCS 800 GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1389
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.21
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameBanded KestrelC79
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 December 2020 (5 years ago)8 January 2009 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19216
Core clock speed300 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate14.413.600
Floating-point processing power0.4612 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Length295 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2020 8 January 2009
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 14 Watt

Atari VCS 800 GPU has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce G205M, on the other hand, has 7.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atari VCS 800 GPU and GeForce G205M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atari VCS 800 GPU is a desktop graphics card while GeForce G205M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Atari VCS 800 GPU
Atari VCS 800 GPU
NVIDIA GeForce G205M
GeForce G205M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 5 votes

Rate Atari VCS 800 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 26 votes

Rate GeForce G205M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Atari VCS 800 GPU or GeForce G205M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.