Radeon 890M vs Arctic Sound-M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated258
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)RDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameArctic SoundPhoenix
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2022 (2 years ago)July 2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81921024
Core clock speed900 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2900 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate230.4185.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width4096 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2.4 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1.23 TB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 890M has a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 3233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arctic Sound-M and Radeon 890M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arctic Sound-M
Arctic Sound-M
AMD Radeon 890M
Radeon 890M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 54 votes

Rate Radeon 890M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.