Nvidia RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop vs Arctic Sound-M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)Blackwell (2024−2025)
GPU code nameArctic Soundno data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2022 (3 years ago)19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81923328
Core clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology10 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Wattno data
Texture fill rate230.4no data
Floating-point processing power14.75 TFLOPSno data
ROPs128no data
TMUs256no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR7
Maximum RAM amount16 GB7.9 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth1.23 TB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 7.9 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm

Arctic Sound-M has a 102.5% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Nvidia RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop, on the other hand, has a 150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Arctic Sound-M and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arctic Sound-M is a workstation card while RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arctic Sound-M
Arctic Sound-M
Nvidia RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arctic Sound-M or RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.