GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Arctic Sound-M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated7
Place by popularitynot in top-10089
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data48.84
Power efficiencyno data19.83
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameArctic SoundAD103
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2022 (2 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81928448
Core clock speed900 MHz2340 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2610 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate230.4689.0
Floating-point processing power14.75 TFLOPS44.1 TFLOPS
ROPs12896
TMUs256264
Tensor Coresno data264
Ray Tracing Coresno data66

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm310 mm
Width1-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPS1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.23 TB/s672.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 285 Watt

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 75.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arctic Sound-M and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arctic Sound-M is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arctic Sound-M
Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2641 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.