Arc A530M vs Arctic Sound-M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated308
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.74
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameArctic SoundDG2-256
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2022 (2 years ago)1 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81921536
Core clock speed900 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate230.4124.8
Floating-point processing power14.75 TFLOPS3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs12848
TMUs25696
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.23 TB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 65 Watt

Arctic Sound-M has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A530M, on the other hand, has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 669.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arctic Sound-M and Arc A530M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arctic Sound-M is a workstation card while Arc A530M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arctic Sound-M
Arctic Sound-M
Intel Arc A530M
Arc A530M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 196 votes

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.